[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EA929A9653AAE14F841771FB1DE5A1365FF4077103@rrsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:44:04 -0600
From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ixgbe: Use netdev_<level>, dev_<level>,
pr_<level>
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:53 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>> From: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
>
> Hi Emil.
>
>> This patch is alternative to a previous patch submitted by Joe
>> Perches.
>
> Why eliminate all the adapter->msg_enable tests?
>
> There are many changes like this. For instance:
>
>> if (link_up && (link_speed == IXGBE_LINK_SPEED_1GB_FULL))
>> - netif_info(adapter, hw, adapter->netdev, "Smartspeed has"
>> - " downgraded the link speed from the maximum"
>> - " advertised\n");
>> + e_info("Smartspeed has downgraded the link speed from "
>> + "the maximum advertised\n");
>
> This was only printed when NETIF_MSG_HW was set,
> now it's always printed.
That's a good question. I'll fix it up and post a follow-up patch, or if Dave wants to reverse it - either way it's fine with me.
Thanks for reviewing.
Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists