[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C24700E.5010301@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:59:58 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sgruszka@...hat.com,
herbert.xu@...hat.com, Ramkrishna.Vepa@...r.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [v4 Patch 1/2] s2io: add dynamic LRO disable support
On 06/22/10 19:44, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 04:50 -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> This patch adds dynamic LRO diable support for s2io net driver.
>>
>> (I don't have s2io card, so only did compiling test. Anyone who wants
>> to test this is more than welcome.)
>>
>> This is based on Neil's initial work, and heavily modified
>> based on Ramkrishna's suggestions.
> [...]
>> +static int s2io_ethtool_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data)
>> +{
>> + struct s2io_nic *sp = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + int changed = 0;
>> +
>> + if (data& ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + if (data& ETH_FLAG_LRO) {
>> + if (lro_enable) {
>> + if (!(dev->features& NETIF_F_LRO)) {
>> + dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
>> + changed = 1;
>> + }
>> + } else
>> + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> Should lro_enable=0 really prevent enabling it later? This seems
> unusual.
>
I agree with Stanislaw on this point.
>> + } else if (dev->features& NETIF_F_LRO) {
>> + dev->features&= ~NETIF_F_LRO;
>> + changed = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (changed&& netif_running(dev)) {
>> + s2io_stop_all_tx_queue(sp);
>> + s2io_card_down(sp);
>> + sp->lro = dev->features& NETIF_F_LRO;
> [...]
>
> This means s2io_nic::lro and ring_info::lro can have the value
> NETIF_F_LRO, where previously they would only have the value 0 or 1. I
> don't know whether this could be a problem, but the safe thing to do is
> to coerce the value by writing !!(dev->features& NETIF_F_LRO).
>
Yeah, agreed.
It seems that Jon already fixed this when he updated the patch.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists