[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4C246149.3090603@sch.bme.hu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:56:57 +0200
From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@....bme.hu>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, fw@...len.de,
jpirko@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] netfilter: allow nf_tproxy_core module to be
removed
Hi,
On 06/24/2010 05:29 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
>> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:46:11 +0200
>>
>>> tproxy assigns skb->destructor, what prevents module unload while
>>> such skbs may
>>> still be around?
>>
>> The only reference to nf_tproxy_core.ko is for the symbol,
>> "nf_tproxy_assign_sock".
>> xt_TPROXY.c, which references this symbol, thus creates a symbol
>> dependency on this
>> module, so xt_TPROXY.o needs to unload before nf_tproxy_core.ko can
>> unload, and
>> xt_TPROXY.o has it's own manner for handling module references properly.
>
> I don't see anything waiting for skbs in flight using the tproxy
> destructor in either xt_TPROXY or nf_tproxy_core though, so I think
> Florian is correct.
Yes, I think Florian and Patrick's right. Right now there's nothing
preventing xt_TPROXY and nf_tproxy_core from being removed while there
are skbs in flight with the tproxy destructor set.
--
KOVACS Krisztian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists