[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100629063932.GA10072@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:39:32 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ben@...adent.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chase.douglas@...onical.com, nordmark@...h.kth.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] 3c59x: Use fine-grained locks for MII
and windowed register access
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:18:12PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> Once Ben posts a new version of this second patch with the
> proper spin_lock_init() calls added I am going to apply both
> of his changes.
Yes, of course apply them. It was just a recommendation to avoid the locks
in the cases they are not needed. These patches are a real improvement,
so I'm fine with them.
Steffen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists