netdev - Re: [PATCH] at1700: fix double free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100709185616.GO19184@bicker>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:56:16 +0200
From:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:	Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] at1700: fix double free_irq

On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:48:09PM +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> > >  	/* Disable the IRQ on boards of fmv18x where it is feasible. */
> >         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > It seems like this comment should be updated?
> 
> Maybe yes, but I don't know what these damn IO requests mean.
> Sure, it's better to request IRQ in xxx_open(), but as it is already
> done in probe() I leave it here.
> 
> If it is a bug then I do nothing with it, but if it is not then I'll
> create a bug.
> 

Yeah.  I see what you mean.  You are probably right.  It should be easy
to test if anyone had the hardware.  But this driver is 17 years old so
I doubt anyone does.  :P

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html