[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1279220266.4411.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:57:46 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [REGRESSION] e1000e stopped working [MANUALLY BISECTED]
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 02:33 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:56 -0600, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
> > Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:23 -0600, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
> > >> Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:58 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > >>>> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 01:13 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 15:48, Maxim Levitsky
> > >>>>> <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Did few guesses, and now I see that reverting the below commit
> > >>>>>> fixes the problem.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> "e1000e: Fix/cleanup PHY reset code for ICHx/PCHx"
> > >>>>>> e98cac447cc1cc418dff1d610a5c79c4f2bdec7f.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>> Maxim Levitsky
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Can you give us till Tuesday to respond? I know that there are
> > >>>>> some additional e1000e patches in my queue, which may resolve the
> > >>>>> issue, but this weekend the power is down to do some
> > >>>>> infrastructure upgrades which prevents us from doing any
> > >>>>> investigation.debugging until Tuesday.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sure.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best regards,
> > >>>> Maxim Levitsky
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Updates?
> > >>
> > >> We are working on reproducing the issue. So far we have not seen the
> > >> problem when testing with net-next.
> > >>
> > >> I asked in previous email about some additional info from ethtool
> > >> (-d, -e, -S) and kernel config. That would help us to narrow it
> > >> down.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Emil
> > > I did send -e and -d output.
> >
> > Sorry, looks like I lost the email with the attachements.
> >
> > Could you provide the output of dmesg after the failure occurs?
> >
> > > Since you probably want -S output during failure, I need to recompile
> > > kernel for that. I will do that soon.
> > >
> > >
> > > One question, in two weeks I hope 2.6.35 won't be released?
> > > If so, I will have enough free time then to narrow down this issue.
> > >
> > > Other solution, is to revert this commit.
> > > (I have never seen this problem with it reverted).
> >
> > We have been running reboot tests on 2 separate systems with recent net-next kernels
> > using your config and so far no luck in reproducing this issue.
> >
> > What is the make model of your system (or MB)?
>
> the motherboard is Intel DG965RY.
>
> However, I am using vanilla kernel.
> net-next might contain further fixes.
>
> I see if net-next works here.
Yep, net-next works here.
I have the problem on vanilla kernel.
Last revision of it, I tested is 2.6.35-rc4 exactly
(815c4163b6c8ebf8152f42b0a5fd015cfdcedc78)
Maybe vanilla git master works, I test it too soon.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists