netdev - Re: Question about way that NICs deliver packets to the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C409DD6.7060903@hp.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:58:46 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Junchang Wang <junchangwang@...il.com>
CC:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, romieu@...zoreil.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about way that NICs deliver packets to the kernel

Junchang Wang wrote:
>>You should also compare the CPU usage.
>>
>>Ben.
>>
> 
> Hi Ben,
> I added options -c -C to netperf's command line. Result is as follows:
>                     scheme 1    scheme 2    Imp.
> Throughput:     683M        718M       5%
> CPU usage:     47.8%       45.6%
> 
> That really surprised me because "top" command showed the CPU usage
> was fluctuating between 0.5% and 1.5% rather that between 45% and 50%.

Can you tell us a bit more about the system, and which version of netperf you 
are using?  Any chance that the CPU utilization you were looking at in top was 
just that being charged to netperf the process?  "Network processing" does not 
often get charged to the responsible process, so netperf reports system-wide CPU 
utilization on the assumption it is the only thing causing the CPUs to be utilized.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html