netdev - Re: [RFC] Enhance dev_ioctl to return <hwaddr>:<if_name::if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:04:07 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	Chetan Loke <chetanloke@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Loke, Chetan" <chetan.loke@...scout.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhance dev_ioctl to return <hwaddr>:<if_name::if_index>
  mapping

On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:10:05 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 09:18 -0400, Chetan Loke wrote:
> [...]
> > Requirement:
> > R1)Ability to address NICs/interfaces using a mac-addr in ioctls. This
> > is required because we don't have a consistent naming scheme for
> > Ethernet devices.Asking customers and/or field-engineers to change
> > udev rules and
> > other config files is not feasible.
> 
> I don't know why they would need to change those.  It might be useful to
> have a simple userland tool that will look up a device name by MAC
> address.  But it's not like a MAC address is any more user-friendly than
> a net device name!
> 
> > Existing pain-points:
> > P1) ioctl needs either i) if-name or ii) if-index before we can invoke
> > bind() etc.This works fine if you know your configuration and it is not going
> > to change.However,if we hot-add a NIC and if you have adapters from multiple
> > vendors(think:driver load order) then upon a reboot,the 'eth'
> > interfaces can be re-mapped.
> 
> As you well know, udev makes the name/MAC-address association
> persistent, so this is no longer a problem.
> 
> [...]
> >   W2.1) If renaming were to even succeed then none of the existing
> > drivers re-register their msix-vectors.
> 
> There is no need to do that, since the IRQ handler names are not copied
> but are held by the driver.  So the driver only needs to rewrite the
> names when the device is renamed.  However that does require registering
> a netdev notifier.  It might be worth adding a netdev operation for
> renaming, to make this easier for driver maintainers.
> 
> [...]
> > But there is no programmatic way of deriving the 'ethX' name.
> [...]
> 
> Deriving it from what?  Are you aiming to determine what the name of a
> device will be before the physical device is installed?
> 
> Ben.
> 

The additional API is not needed. It is trivial to find address for device
and do reverse mapping. Either with ioctl's or /sys/class/net/XXX/addr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html