netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 16517] New: rp_filter fails to filter with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH and more than one 0/0 nexthop dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100805134653.9e8985cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:46:53 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	netfilter@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 16517] New: rp_filter fails to filter with
 CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH and more than one 0/0 nexthop dev


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:48:01 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16517
> 
>            Summary: rp_filter fails to filter with
>                     CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH and more than one 0/0
>                     nexthop dev
>            Product: Networking
>            Version: 2.5
>     Kernel Version: at least 2.6.18 and newer
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: high
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: IPV4
>         AssignedTo: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
>         ReportedBy: for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@...il.com
>         Regression: No
> 
> 
> I think the problem is net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c fib_validate_source()
> 
> ...
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH
>     if (FIB_RES_DEV(res) == dev || res.fi->fib_nhs > 1)
> #else
>     if (FIB_RES_DEV(res) == dev)
> #endif
> ...
> 
> I'm not sure, but this code is quite trivial and self-speaking. In case we have
> several default routes, we'd better iterate over each of them and compare
> resulting devices with the input one. So, fix is also trivial, specially for
> network kernel developers. ;-)
> 
> I've set priority "High" cause it doesn't affects usual Linux users directly,
> but indirectly it can affect any host on Internet, so the problem is
> significant, of course.
> 
> P. S. Kernel docs say: {
> rp_filter - INTEGER
>         0 - No source validation.
>         1 - Strict mode as defined in RFC3704 Strict Reverse Path
>             Each incoming packet is tested against the FIB and if the interface
>             is not the best reverse path the packet check will fail.
>             By default failed packets are discarded.
>         2 - Loose mode as defined in RFC3704 Loose Reverse Path
>             Each incoming packet's source address is also tested against the
> FIB
>             and if the source address is not reachable via any interface
>             the packet check will fail.
> 
>         Current recommended practice in RFC3704 is to enable strict mode
>         to prevent IP spoofing from DDos attacks. If using asymmetric routing
>         or other complicated routing, then loose mode is recommended.
> 
>         conf/all/rp_filter must also be set to non-zero to do source validation
>         on the interface
> 
>         Default value is 0. Note that some distributions enable it
>         in startup scripts.
> }, but is in reality level "2" of rp_filtering implemented?
> 
> P. P. S. netfilter would be the best place to have Reverse Path checks. But
> that's another story.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html