[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100811122026.GB2587@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:20:26 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linville@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:03:30AM -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:31:17PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > Linus's tree is fine for this.
> >
> > But we need this fix for 2.6.35-stable too. Herbert would
> > you object to putting John's more simple fix there?
>
> To use rcu_read_lock safely we'd also need to add do synchronize_rcu
> in addition of synchronize_rcu_bh, right Paul?
That is true.
> Of course as we were doing this unsafely prior to my patch anyway
> I'm also fine with just reverting it.
That is true as well.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists