[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100811153736.GA31577@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:37:36 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:27:06AM -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:03:30AM -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > To use rcu_read_lock safely we'd also need to add do synchronize_rcu
> > in addition of synchronize_rcu_bh, right Paul?
> >
> > Of course as we were doing this unsafely prior to my patch anyway
> > I'm also fine with just reverting it.
>
> Actually, we could just disable IRQs for stable. How about this
> patch (untested)?
>
> netpoll: Disable IRQ around RCU dereference in netpoll_rx
>
> We cannot use rcu_dereference_bh safely in netpoll_rx as we may
> be called with IRQs disabled. We could however simply disable
> IRQs as that too causes BH to be disabled and is safe in either
> case.
>
> Thanks to John Linville for discovering this bug and providing
> a patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
This also seems to work for me.
John
P.S. As pointed-out elsewhere, my patch neglected to change
synchronize_rcu_bh to synchronize_rcu in netpoll.c. If some fault
is found w/ Herbert's patch then I can post a modified version of mine.
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists