netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/1] netfilter: xt_condition: add condition target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1008121202320.31027@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:10:02 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com>
cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com, janne.ylalehto@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] netfilter: xt_condition: add condition target


On Thursday 2010-08-12 08:37, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>
>One thing that came to my mind was whether it would make sense to
>rename this match/target combo to "variable" instead of "condition".
>To me it makes more sense to call it variable than condition, since
>I have changed the value from boolean to u32. On the other hand, it
>could become very confusing because it used to be called condition
>in its xtables-addons days...

To improve matters, POSIX has something called "condition variables".
So oh well let's just leave it as-is :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html