netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/1] netfilter: xt_condition: add condition target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1281608044.4440.18.camel@powerslave>
Date:	Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:14:04 +0300
From:	Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com>
To:	ext Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Ylalehto Janne (Nokia-MS/Tampere)" <janne.ylalehto@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] netfilter: xt_condition: add condition target

On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:10 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2010-08-12 08:37, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >
> >One thing that came to my mind was whether it would make sense to
> >rename this match/target combo to "variable" instead of "condition".
> >To me it makes more sense to call it variable than condition, since
> >I have changed the value from boolean to u32. On the other hand, it
> >could become very confusing because it used to be called condition
> >in its xtables-addons days...
> 
> To improve matters, POSIX has something called "condition variables".
> So oh well let's just leave it as-is :)

:D

Okay, let's keep it like this, I guess it would just complicate things
more if we change it.

-- 
Cheers,
Luca.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html