netdev - Re: [TCP]: min_t/max_t confusion in tcp_select_initial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93bf5f79c0e69b1853298bbce1876b5b@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:09:30 +0200
From:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <roel.kluin@...il.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TCP]: min_t/max_t confusion in tcp_select_initial_window()?


On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:23:11 +0200 (EET), "Ilpo Järvinen" wrote:

> Yeah, I'm wrong, and besides misread your "It looks correct" to mean the

> proposed change rather than the current code.

But the code is not correct if we consider reduced buffers via
setsockopt(), some days ago I sent a patch to fix the problem.

Ilpo? David?

Hagen

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html