[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C806388.9020509@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:55:04 +0900
From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: rostedt@...dmis.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com,
izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
nhorman@...driver.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets
(2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote:
> From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900
>
>> Thanks many acks. and I have one question.
>>
>> These patches have several component.
>>
>> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component.
>> What tree is good to be included ?
>> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree.
>
> I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate
> for patch #1.
>
O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip.
Thanks,
Koki Sanagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists