[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100903044656.GA6589@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:46:58 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] netdev: show a process of packets
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:55:04AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote:
> (2010/09/03 11:17), David Miller wrote:
> > From: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>
> > Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:51 +0900
> >
> >> Thanks many acks. and I have one question.
> >>
> >> These patches have several component.
> >>
> >> Patch1 is kernel component, but patch2-5 are netdev component.
> >> What tree is good to be included ?
> >> If it is not net-next, I must rebase to another tree.
> >
> > I would prefer it goes into the tracing tree or whatever is the most appropriate
> > for patch #1.
> >
>
> O.K. I'll rebase to linux-2.6-tip.
No need, they apply very well :)
I'll push that to -tip soon.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists