[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283979861.2479.21.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:04:21 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: vladislav.yasevich@...com, error27@...il.com, sri@...ibm.com,
yjwei@...fujitsu.com, cascardo@...oscopio.com,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Alternative PATCH net-next] sctp: fix test for end of loop
Perhaps something like this is clearer?
Add a list_has_sctp_addr function to simplify loop
Based on a patches by Dan Carpenter and David Miller
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
---
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index 8b28443..4b4eb7c 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -1232,6 +1232,18 @@ out:
return 0;
}
+static bool list_has_sctp_addr(const struct list_head *list,
+ union sctp_addr *ipaddr)
+{
+ struct sctp_transport *addr;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(addr, list, transports) {
+ if (sctp_cmp_addr_exact(ipaddr, &addr->ipaddr))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
/* A restart is occurring, check to make sure no new addresses
* are being added as we may be under a takeover attack.
*/
@@ -1240,10 +1252,10 @@ static int sctp_sf_check_restart_addrs(const struct sctp_association *new_asoc,
struct sctp_chunk *init,
sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands)
{
- struct sctp_transport *new_addr, *addr;
- int found;
+ struct sctp_transport *new_addr;
+ int ret = 1;
- /* Implementor's Guide - Sectin 5.2.2
+ /* Implementor's Guide - Section 5.2.2
* ...
* Before responding the endpoint MUST check to see if the
* unexpected INIT adds new addresses to the association. If new
@@ -1254,31 +1266,19 @@ static int sctp_sf_check_restart_addrs(const struct sctp_association *new_asoc,
/* Search through all current addresses and make sure
* we aren't adding any new ones.
*/
- new_addr = NULL;
- found = 0;
-
list_for_each_entry(new_addr, &new_asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
- transports) {
- found = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(addr, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
- transports) {
- if (sctp_cmp_addr_exact(&new_addr->ipaddr,
- &addr->ipaddr)) {
- found = 1;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!found)
+ transports) {
+ if (!list_has_sctp_addr(&asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
+ &new_addr->ipaddr)) {
+ sctp_sf_send_restart_abort(&new_addr->ipaddr, init,
+ commands);
+ ret = 0;
break;
- }
-
- /* If a new address was added, ABORT the sender. */
- if (!found && new_addr) {
- sctp_sf_send_restart_abort(&new_addr->ipaddr, init, commands);
+ }
}
/* Return success if all addresses were found. */
- return found;
+ return ret;
}
/* Populate the verification/tie tags based on overlapping INIT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists