[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100908.140512.242117688.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: santwona.behera@....com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
dm@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ethtool: Complete kernel-doc comments for
RX flow filter and hash control
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:46:20 +0100
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> There are now several interfaces within the ethtool API for getting
>> and setting RX flow filtering and hashing behaviour, most of which are
>> poorly documented. This adds kernel-doc comments for all these
>> interfaces, based on the existing incomplete comments and on the
>> initial implementations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>> ---
>> Santwona, Peter,
>>
>> Please point out any errors and any information that should be added to
>> the comments to explain the significant differences between the RXNFC
>> and RXNTUPLE interfaces.
> [...]
>> +/**
>> + * struct ethtool_rx_ntuple - command to get or set RX flow filter
>> + * @cmd: Specific command number - %ETHTOOL_GRXNTUPLE or %ETHTOOL_SRXNTUPLE
>
> Of course this is wrong - ETHTOOL_GRXNTUPLE uses struct ethtool_gstrings
> instead.
Ben, please submit a fixed up version of the patch.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists