[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283870780.2270.12.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:46:20 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Santwona Behera <santwona.behera@....com>,
Peter Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ethtool: Complete kernel-doc comments for
RX flow filter and hash control
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:41 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There are now several interfaces within the ethtool API for getting
> and setting RX flow filtering and hashing behaviour, most of which are
> poorly documented. This adds kernel-doc comments for all these
> interfaces, based on the existing incomplete comments and on the
> initial implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> ---
> Santwona, Peter,
>
> Please point out any errors and any information that should be added to
> the comments to explain the significant differences between the RXNFC
> and RXNTUPLE interfaces.
[...]
> +/**
> + * struct ethtool_rx_ntuple - command to get or set RX flow filter
> + * @cmd: Specific command number - %ETHTOOL_GRXNTUPLE or %ETHTOOL_SRXNTUPLE
Of course this is wrong - ETHTOOL_GRXNTUPLE uses struct ethtool_gstrings
instead.
Ben.
> + * @fs: Flow filter specification
> + */
> struct ethtool_rx_ntuple {
> __u32 cmd;
> struct ethtool_rx_ntuple_flow_spec fs;
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists