[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283870637.2270.10.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:43:57 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>
Cc: Peter Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: (Lack of) specification for RX n-tuple filtering
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:50 -0700, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > The n-tuple filtering facility is half-baked at present. There is an
> > interface to add filters but none to remove them! And ETHTOOL_GRXNTUPLE
> > is not at all symmetric with ETHTOOL_SRXNTUPLE (which I complained about
> > at the time it was added, to no avail).
>
> It's a bit worse than that. Currently one can only append filters, not
> insert at a given position, as ethtool_rx_ntuple doesn't have an index
> field. For devices that use TCAMs, where position matters, it's quite an
> obstacle. It also means one cannot modify an existing filter by specifying
> a new filter for the same index.
It looks like drivers for devices that use TCAMs should implement the
RXNFC interface instead.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists