[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100914.134529.45905377.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ipv4: release dev refcnt early when destroying
inetdev
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:16:14 +0200
> Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010 à 16:57 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
>
>> Is this not true in IPv6? What is the difference?
>
> It might be a bug on ipv6, who knows ?
>
> Releasing a reference count, but not setting idev->dev to NULL is
> a sign something is wrong...
If anything this is more of a BUG trap than a true correctness patch,
but either way if you want me to apply this please formally submit
this with a proper commit message and signoff, thanks!
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 5bc893e..26e39bc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ void in6_dev_finish_destroy(struct inet6_dev *idev)
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "in6_dev_finish_destroy: %s\n", dev ? dev->name : "NIL");
> #endif
> dev_put(dev);
> + idev->dev = NULL;
> if (!idev->dead) {
> pr_warning("Freeing alive inet6 device %p\n", idev);
> return;
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists