[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinE50xFx9nShGBeOf483G2FhogO-BCj=dfHBZS7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:45:19 +0200
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 18492] New: kernel softirq warning on boot
On 14 September 2010 21:07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:19:30 GMT
> bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18492
>>
>> Summary: kernel softirq warning on boot
>> Product: Drivers
>> Version: 2.5
>> Kernel Version: 2.6.36-rc4
>
> Looks like a post-2.6.35 regression. I'd be looking at the
Indeed, I found a log from booting 2.6.35 kernel while trying to work
around anouther issue and the warning did not show in it.
> rcu_read_unlock_bh() in netpoll_rx(), added by "netpoll: Fix RCU
> usage".
Do you mean de85d99eb7b595f6751550184b94c1e2f74a828b?
I am not sure reverting just that would work, nor that the kernel
around that point is in shape for trying on a system I would want to
still use. It's way back in history for a kernel which is just to be
released.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists