[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285009546.2282.126.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:05:46 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 7/8] sfc: Set net_device::num_rx_queues
once we know the correct value
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 20:54 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 20 septembre 2010 à 19:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/sfc/efx.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c
> > index 4a1c93f..48e2bf4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/efx.c
> > @@ -1315,6 +1315,7 @@ static int efx_probe_nic(struct efx_nic *efx)
> >
> > efx_set_channels(efx);
> > efx->net_dev->real_num_tx_queues = efx->n_tx_channels;
> > + efx->net_dev->num_rx_queues = efx->n_rx_channels;
> >
> > /* Initialise the interrupt moderation settings */
> > efx_init_irq_moderation(efx, tx_irq_mod_usec, rx_irq_mod_usec, true);
> > --
> > 1.7.2.1
> >
> >
> >
>
> Interesting, but why ?
>
> No other driver does this AFAIK...
If RPS is enabled there's a separate kobject for each RX queue. Those
other drivers probably should be setting it.
Oh, but this only exists if CONFIG_RPS is enabled. I think we need an
inline function for setting this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists