[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100928.222510.71109554.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gwurster@....carleton.ca
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, shemminger@...tta.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6 v2] IPv6: Create temporary address if none
exists.
From: Glenn Wurster <gwurster@....carleton.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:04:30 -0400
> If privacy extentions are enabled, but no current temporary address exists,
> then create one when we get a router advertisement.
>
> Version 2, now with 100% fewer line wraps. Thanks to David Miller for
> pointing out the line wrapping issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Wurster <gwurster@....carleton.ca>
The existing code is correct from what I can tell.
Variable "create" is true when "ifp == NULL" and "valid_lft != 0"
And RFC 3041 explicitly states in section 3.3:
When a new public address is created as described in [ADDRCONF]
(because the prefix advertised does not match the prefix of any
address already assigned to the interface, and Valid Lifetime
in the option is not zero), also create a new temporary address.
Your patch is going to cause us to create a temporary address even
when valid_lft is zero, which the RFC says we should not do.
That goes against what the RFC tells us to do, so I can only conclude
that your patch is not correct.
I'm not applying this, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists