netdev - Re: [STABLE 2.6.32 PATCH] net: release dst entry while cache-hot for GSO case too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:52 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	avagin@...il.com
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mjt@....msk.ru,
	avagin@...nvz.org, stable@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	krkumar2@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [STABLE 2.6.32 PATCH] net: release dst entry while cache-hot
 for GSO case too

Le lundi 11 octobre 2010 à 20:19 +0400, Andrew Vagin a écrit :
> On 10/11/2010 07:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:46:49 +0200
> >
> >> This patch was an optimization, not a bug fix.
> > Right, this has no business going into 2.6.32-stable at all.
> This is bug fix. Now nobody drops dst in case gso and veth, because the 
> commit 60df914e295a21a223e43a7ee01e0c73c64dd111 deletes skb_dst_drop 
> from the veth.c. We should commit my patch or revert commit 60df914e.
> 
> We have two bug reports:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg142104.html
> 
> http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1634
> 
> Taylan verified that the patch really fix his bug.

Now that makes sense ;)

This is always good to mention commit id of a bug origin.

Because reading your patch (changelog and content), it was not obvious
it fixed a bug.

Thanks !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html