lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB34177.6030902@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:55:19 +0400
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	avagin@...il.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	avagin@...nvz.org, stable@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	krkumar2@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [STABLE 2.6.32 PATCH] net: release dst entry while cache-hot
 for GSO case too

11.10.2010 20:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 11 octobre 2010 à 20:19 +0400, Andrew Vagin a écrit :
>> On 10/11/2010 07:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:46:49 +0200
>>>
>>>> This patch was an optimization, not a bug fix.
>>> Right, this has no business going into 2.6.32-stable at all.
>> This is bug fix. Now nobody drops dst in case gso and veth, because the 
>> commit 60df914e295a21a223e43a7ee01e0c73c64dd111 deletes skb_dst_drop 
>> from the veth.c. We should commit my patch or revert commit 60df914e.
>>
>> We have two bug reports:
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg142104.html

This is korg#17251: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17251 ,
from me.

But I really wonder how that thing does not happen anymore
when I disabled netfilter hooks...  I can't experiment till
weekend, but I'll try to get back to it and re-verify again,
with and without this fix, with and without netfilter hooks.

What I know for sure is 2 facts: I can't trigger the problem
now (with the hooks disabled), and I can't trigger it on a
subsequent kernel releases - e.g. 2.6.35 does not have the
issue, but 2.6.32 has.

>> http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1634

Thanks!

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ