[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101019202941.GE7497@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:29:41 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: nhorman@...driver.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
fubar@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, andy@...yhouse.net,
amwang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: minor cleanups to bond + netpoll
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 01:04:24PM -0400, nhorman@...driver.com wrote:
> Testing that was onging when the the reset patchset to enable netpoll over
> bonding revealed some minor corner cases that are worth correcting. In summary:
>
> 1) Remove netpoll tx blocking from bond_release_all. Its not needed and causes
> some uglyness when removing the bonding module, in the form of a backtrace that
> gets logged. blocking isn't needed in this path anyway as the netconsole is
> already unregistered from us at this point
>
> 2) Remove my changes to napi_poll. Closer inspection of the bonding
> poll_controller show that we wind up recursively calling the napi poll routines
> for the slaves through sucsessive calls to netpoll_poll_dev. My origional
> change is harmless, but its not really needed, so lets make the code simpler.
>
> Further details available in the individual commit messages
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
>
I've done some quick testing with these and they address the concerns I
raised with Neil about his first patch-set.
Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists