[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBE9E7F.60107@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:47:11 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: nhorman@...driver.com
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
fubar@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove netpoll blocking from uninit path
On 10/20/10 01:04, nhorman@...driver.com wrote:
> From: Neil Horman<nhorman@...driver.com>
>
> Some recent testing in netpoll with bonding showed this backtrace
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h:134!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2/usb7/devnum
> CPU 0
> Pid: 1876, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.36-rc3+ #10 D26928/
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0514ba4>] [<ffffffffa0514ba4>] bond_uninit+0x6f4/0x7a0
> RSP: 0018:ffff88003b1b5d58 EFLAGS: 00010296
> RAX: ffff88003b9b6200 RBX: ffff8800373e8e00 RCX: 00000000000f4240
> RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 0000000000000286 RDI: 0000000000000286
> RBP: ffff88003b1b5dc8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000001af7de920
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff880002495e98 R12: ffff880037922700
> R13: ffff880038c31000 R14: ffff880037922730 R15: 0000000000000286
> FS: 00007f90e6d72700(0000) GS:ffff880002400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 000000346f0d9ad0 CR3: 000000003b263000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process rmmod (pid: 1876, threadinfo ffff88003b1b4000, task ffff88003b36aa80)
> Stack:
> 00000000ffffffff ffff88003b1b5d7a ffff8800379221e8 ffff880037922000
> <0> ffff88003b1b5dc8 ffffffff813eb5fb ffff88003b1b5da8 0000000031b177a3
> <0> ffff88003b1b5da8 ffff880037922000 ffff88003b1b5e48 ffff88003b1b5e48
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff813eb5fb>] ? rtmsg_ifinfo+0xcb/0xf0
> [<ffffffff813daad8>] rollback_registered_many+0x168/0x280
> [<ffffffff813dac09>] unregister_netdevice_many+0x19/0x80
> [<ffffffff813e97b3>] __rtnl_kill_links+0x63/0x90
> [<ffffffff813e980b>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x2b/0x60
> [<ffffffff813e9bde>] rtnl_link_unregister+0x1e/0x30
> [<ffffffffa052124b>] bonding_exit+0x37/0x51 [bonding]
> [<ffffffff81098b2e>] sys_delete_module+0x19e/0x270
> [<ffffffff810bb2b2>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x252/0x280
> [<ffffffff8100b0b2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> RIP [<ffffffffa0514ba4>] bond_uninit+0x6f4/0x7a0 [bonding]
> RSP<ffff88003b1b5d58>
> ---[ end trace 1395ad691cea24d1 ]---
>
> It occurs because of my recent netpoll blocking patches, which I added to avoid
> recursive deadlock in the bonding driver. It relies on some per cpu bits, but
> the shutdown path forces some rescheduling as we cancel workqueues for the
> driver and wait for some device refcounts. If after the forced reschedule, we
> wind up on a different cpu we trigger the bughalt in unblock_netpoll_tx.
>
> The fix is to remove the netpoll block/unblock calls from bond_release_all.
> This is safe to do because bond_uninit, which is called via ndo_uninit in
> rollback_registered_many, doesn't occur until we send a NETDEV_UNREGISTER event,
> which triggers netconsole to remove us as a netpoll client, so we are guaranteed
> not to recurse into our own tx path here.
Also bond_release_all() is called after bond_netpoll_cleanup()
in bond_uninit().
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman<nhorman@...driver.com>
Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists