netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: allocate tx queues in register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CBCF23D.50006@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:19:57 -0700
From:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
CC:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: allocate tx queues in register_netdevice

On 10/18/2010 5:17 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:12 PM, John Fastabend
> <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> wrote:
>> On 10/18/2010 2:41 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 11:02 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>>> This patch introduces netif_alloc_netdev_queues which is called from
>>>> register_device instead of alloc_netdev_mq.  This makes TX queue
>>>> allocation symmetric with RX allocation similarly allows drivers to
>>>> change dev->num_tx_queues after allocating netdev and before
>>>> registering it.
>>>
>>> Changing num_tx_queues is probably *not* desirable, same as for
>>> num_rx_queues.
>>>
> 
> Okay, so both netif_set_real_num_rx_queues and
> netif_set_real_num_tx_queues should return -EINVAL if queue count >
> num_[tr]x_queues?
> 

Yes and also if txq|rxq < 1 but it looks like this case is covered.

>>
>> Right, this will break ixgbe and other drivers that may call netif_set_real_num_{rx|tx}_queues() to increase the number of
>> queues. Returning an error code seems like a good idea though.
>>
>> John.
>>
>>> [...]
>>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>>> @@ -1553,18 +1553,24 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>>>   * Routine to help set real_num_tx_queues. To avoid skbs mapped to queues
>>>>   * greater then real_num_tx_queues stale skbs on the qdisc must be flushed.
>>>>   */
>>>> -void netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
>>>> +int netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
>>>>  {
>>>> -    unsigned int real_num = dev->real_num_tx_queues;
>>>> +    if (txq < 1)
>>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> -    if (unlikely(txq > dev->num_tx_queues))
>>>> -            ;
>>>> -    else if (txq > real_num)
>>>> -            dev->real_num_tx_queues = txq;
>>>> -    else if (txq < real_num) {
>>>> -            dev->real_num_tx_queues = txq;
>>>> -            qdisc_reset_all_tx_gt(dev, txq);
>>>> -    }
>>>> +    if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) {
>>>> +            ASSERT_RTNL();
>>>> +
>>>> +            if (txq > dev->num_tx_queues)
>>>> +                    return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> +            if (txq < dev->real_num_tx_queues)
>>>> +                    qdisc_reset_all_tx_gt(dev, txq);
>>>> +    } else
>>>> +            dev->num_tx_queues = txq;
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> The kernel-doc comment should be updated to reflect the locking
>>> requirement and the possibility of failure when called after
>>> registration.
>>>
>>> Ben.
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html