[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinX+2aW_yDa0o=oiaxt6BJGNWjiifGCS7auz0O9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:17:41 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: allocate tx queues in register_netdevice
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:12 PM, John Fastabend
<john.r.fastabend@...el.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 2:41 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 11:02 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> This patch introduces netif_alloc_netdev_queues which is called from
>>> register_device instead of alloc_netdev_mq. This makes TX queue
>>> allocation symmetric with RX allocation similarly allows drivers to
>>> change dev->num_tx_queues after allocating netdev and before
>>> registering it.
>>
>> Changing num_tx_queues is probably *not* desirable, same as for
>> num_rx_queues.
>>
Okay, so both netif_set_real_num_rx_queues and
netif_set_real_num_tx_queues should return -EINVAL if queue count >
num_[tr]x_queues?
>
> Right, this will break ixgbe and other drivers that may call netif_set_real_num_{rx|tx}_queues() to increase the number of
> queues. Returning an error code seems like a good idea though.
>
> John.
>
>> [...]
>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>> @@ -1553,18 +1553,24 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>> * Routine to help set real_num_tx_queues. To avoid skbs mapped to queues
>>> * greater then real_num_tx_queues stale skbs on the qdisc must be flushed.
>>> */
>>> -void netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
>>> +int netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
>>> {
>>> - unsigned int real_num = dev->real_num_tx_queues;
>>> + if (txq < 1)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> - if (unlikely(txq > dev->num_tx_queues))
>>> - ;
>>> - else if (txq > real_num)
>>> - dev->real_num_tx_queues = txq;
>>> - else if (txq < real_num) {
>>> - dev->real_num_tx_queues = txq;
>>> - qdisc_reset_all_tx_gt(dev, txq);
>>> - }
>>> + if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) {
>>> + ASSERT_RTNL();
>>> +
>>> + if (txq > dev->num_tx_queues)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + if (txq < dev->real_num_tx_queues)
>>> + qdisc_reset_all_tx_gt(dev, txq);
>>> + } else
>>> + dev->num_tx_queues = txq;
>> [...]
>>
>> The kernel-doc comment should be updated to reflect the locking
>> requirement and the possibility of failure when called after
>> registration.
>>
>> Ben.
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists