[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimy5Pg1aUMfCZG+r+Zb=A_udx8NsYf3TXVHHTsf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:52:15 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"shemminger@...tta.com" <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vmxnet3: fix typo setting confPA
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Shreyas Bhatewara
<sbhatewara@...are.com> wrote:
>> From: Harvey Harrison [mailto:harvey.harrison@...il.com]
>> One question I had when looking into this, why are you doing
>> byteswapping in the VMXNET_{READ,WRITE}_BAR{0,1}
>> macros?
>
> Because values need to be written in LE orders in registers. For eg. when rx_ring.next2fill index is written to RXPROD reg, it should be converted from CPU order to LE.
Yes, but (unless I'm mistaken) writel always writes out in
little-endian, so there isn't a need to swap the arguments,
similarly for readl in the other direction.
You wouldn't notice this on a little-endian machine obviously, has
this even bee tried on be?
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists