[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101026192511.GA3494@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:25:11 -0200
From: Flavio Leitner <fleitner@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: reset gso header when the copied skb is linearized
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:31:57AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Flavio Leitner <fleitner@...hat.com>
> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:23:18 -0200
>
> > The gso header is incorrect when the copied skb is
> > linearized. This patch creates another helper function
> > to copy the gso header when it is appropriated
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <fleitner@...hat.com>
>
> I don't understand why the GSO information should be
> omitted just because we are creating a linearlized
> version of the SKB?
If I understand that correctly, the gso_segs is the number
of GSO segments which are divided in non-linear way. When the
copy is made using that function, the skb turns into a big
one segment inlined. So, the idea of segments is lost and
I'm not seeing how it is going to be divided again.
Later the NIC drives does, for example:
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
...
if (cleaned) {
struct sk_buff *skb = buffer_info->skb;
unsigned int segs, bytecount;
segs = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs ?: 1;
/* multiply data chunks by size of * headers */
bytecount = ((segs - 1) * skb_headlen(skb)) +
skb->len;
total_tx_packets += segs;
total_tx_bytes += bytecount;
}
...
The bytecount there will be wrong because it will multiply
the old gso_segs X skb_headlen(skb) which will be the entire
skb as the payload is inlined.
I see that there are some places checking for skb_is_gso()
before do something or calculating using that math above.
> The packet still could have a larger than MSS size,
> and thus be composed of multiple actual segments for
> the network.
hopefully I answered this too in my previous comment
thanks,
--
Flavio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists