netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] xps: Improvements in TX queue selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:18:47 +0200
From:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] xps: Improvements in TX queue selection

Hi,

Am Donnerstag 21 Oktober 2010 schrieb Tom Herbert:
> In dev_pick_tx, don't do work in calculating queue index or setting
> the index in the sock unless the device has more than one queue.  This
> allows the sock to be set only with a queue index of a multi-queue
> device which is desirable if device are stacked like in a tunnel.
> 
> We also allow the mapping of a socket to queue to be changed.  To
> maintain in order packet transmission a flag (ooo_okay) has been
> added to the sk_buff structure.  If a transport layer sets this flag
> on a packet, the transmit queue can be changed for the socket.
> Presumably, the transport would set this if there was no possbility
> of creating OOO packets (for instance, there are no packets in flight
> for the socket).  This patch includes the modification in TCP output
> for setting this flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> ---

[...]

> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index b2269ac..a538ed5 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2123,28 +2123,32 @@ static struct netdev_queue *dev_pick_tx(struct net_device *dev,
>  					struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  	int queue_index;
> -	const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>  
> -	if (ops->ndo_select_queue) {
> -		queue_index = ops->ndo_select_queue(dev, skb);
> -		queue_index = dev_cap_txqueue(dev, queue_index);
> -	} else {
> +	if (dev->real_num_tx_queues > 1) {
>  		struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
> +
>  		queue_index = sk_tx_queue_get(sk);
> -		if (queue_index < 0) {
>  
> -			queue_index = 0;
> -			if (dev->real_num_tx_queues > 1)
> +		if (queue_index < 0 || skb->ooo_okay ||
> +		    queue_index >= dev->real_num_tx_queues) {
> +			const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
> +			int old_index = queue_index;
> +
> +			if (ops->ndo_select_queue) {
> +				queue_index = ops->ndo_select_queue(dev, skb);
> +				queue_index = dev_cap_txqueue(dev, queue_index);
> +			} else
>  				queue_index = skb_tx_hash(dev, skb);

Wouldn't that break mac80211 QoS again for bridged AP mode interfaces (see
commit deabc772f39405054a438d711f408d2d94d26d96, "net: fix tx queue selection
for bridged devices implementing select_queue")?

Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html