[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6EXFDNw0uJfCSPj8gucQvFi3423kCG+pjS=vJ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:20:49 -0500
From: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: fix ip_mc_drop_socket()
Looks good here.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Hmm, I believe I found the bug.
>
> Thanks guys !
>
> [PATCH] inet: fix ip_mc_drop_socket()
>
> commit 8723e1b4ad9be4444 (inet: RCU changes in inetdev_by_index())
> forgot one call site in ip_mc_drop_socket()
>
> We should not decrease idev refcount after inetdev_by_index() call,
> since refcount is not increased anymore.
>
> Reported-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
> Reported-by: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/igmp.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
> index c8877c6..3c53c2d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
> @@ -2306,10 +2306,8 @@ void ip_mc_drop_socket(struct sock *sk)
>
> in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, iml->multi.imr_ifindex);
> (void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
> - if (in_dev != NULL) {
> + if (in_dev != NULL)
> ip_mc_dec_group(in_dev, iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr);
> - in_dev_put(in_dev);
> - }
> /* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
> atomic_sub(sizeof(*iml), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> call_rcu(&iml->rcu, ip_mc_socklist_reclaim);
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists