[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101111.185917.68135794.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:59:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: drosenberg@...curity.com
Cc: socketcan@...tkopp.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, jmorris@...ei.org, remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com,
pekkas@...core.fi, sri@...ibm.com, vladislav.yasevich@...com,
tj@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
joe@...ches.com, shemminger@...tta.com, hadi@...atatu.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, adobriyan@...il.com, jpirko@...hat.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr, xemul@...nvz.org,
socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses in net/
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500
> This has already been suggested, and I agree it is a much better
> approach. If I take this approach, and find some suitable substitute
> for those cases where the socket inode is not available, will you
> consider these changes?
I will consider an approach where the keys reported allow object
tracking equally as the actual pointers allow for right now.
I've said that this is my criteria about 3 times now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists