[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101114.151529.183053743.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:15:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: therbert@...gle.com
Cc: john.r.fastabend@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH] nete zero kobject in rx_queue_release
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:00 -0800
>> So we'll need something like:
>>
>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&first->count))
>> kfree(first);
>> else
>> /* clear everything except queue->first */
>>
>
> The patches to get rid of the separate refcnt should obviate this
> complexity. Could just clear the queue in kobject release.
True but we'll still need a patch for older kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists