[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE1E73C.1000105@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:06:52 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "therbert@...gle.com" <therbert@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH] nete zero kobject in rx_queue_release
On 11/14/2010 3:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:00 -0800
>
>>> So we'll need something like:
>>>
>>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&first->count))
>>> kfree(first);
>>> else
>>> /* clear everything except queue->first */
>>>
>>
>> The patches to get rid of the separate refcnt should obviate this
>> complexity. Could just clear the queue in kobject release.
>
> True but we'll still need a patch for older kernels.
OK Thanks. I'll have a stable patch and a net-2.6 patch soon.
-- John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists