[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE22F22.4000706@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:13:38 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "therbert@...gle.com" <therbert@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH] nete zero kobject in rx_queue_release
On 11/15/2010 6:06 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 3:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
>> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:00 -0800
>>
>>>> So we'll need something like:
>>>>
>>>> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&first->count))
>>>> kfree(first);
>>>> else
>>>> /* clear everything except queue->first */
>>>>
>>>
>>> The patches to get rid of the separate refcnt should obviate this
>>> complexity. Could just clear the queue in kobject release.
>>
>> True but we'll still need a patch for older kernels.
>
> OK Thanks. I'll have a stable patch and a net-2.6 patch soon.
>
> -- John
To address Tom's comment, queue->dev would need to be reset if the queue was cleared. In the latest patch I didn't bother and just clear the kobject.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists