[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE11475.30905@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:07:33 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: place in source hash after SNAT is done
On 15.11.2010 05:48, Changli Gao wrote:
> If SNAT isn't done, the wrong info maybe got by the other cts.
>
> As the filter table is after DNAT table, the packets dropped in filter
> table also bother bysource hash table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
> index c04787c..51ce55a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
> @@ -545,11 +550,10 @@ static void nf_nat_move_storage(void *new, void *old)
> struct nf_conn_nat *old_nat = old;
> struct nf_conn *ct = old_nat->ct;
>
> - if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK))
> + if (!ct || !(ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE))
> return;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&nf_nat_lock);
> - new_nat->ct = ct;
Why are you removing this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists