netdev - Re: Fwd: a Great Idea - include Kademlia networking protocol in kernel -- REVISITED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:11:00 +0800
From:	Honglei Cong <conghonglei@...il.com>
To:	Marcos <stalkingtime@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: a Great Idea - include Kademlia networking protocol in
 kernel -- REVISITED

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Marcos <stalkingtime@...il.com> wrote:
> [Eric Dumazet wrote:]
>> But we dont want a "super operating system". We want a good one.
>
> Yes, well you have that, I think, speaking at the kernel level.  But
> the thing is, people are building tools that mimic such anyway, and
> the next wave of new value will be found there.
>
>> Memory stores done in userland are as fast as memory stores done in
>> kernel.
>
> Really? And how about the abstraction-level?  because that will either
> make it lucrative or not for developers to build applications for
> it.....
>
>> Once you need to access files, perform complex searches, timers,
>> logging, and all the stuff, you really want to do it from userland, in
>> high level language that many programmers master, or get something that
>> is too complex/buggy.
>
> Yes, of course, all that will have to be considered.   But I'm
> suggesting that such a move is an investment in the future, that the
> the number of machines that will want or request peer-2-peer
> connectivity will (or should) only increase.  Done right, such a move
> should *simplify* things.  We're biased to think in centralized ways
> because of the centuries-old history of *who* has the resources.  But
> as networking, computation, and storage become commodified further,
> whole new topologies for the *right* architecture become available.
> The idea of "the OS" itself morphs.   And the *only* way maximize the
Agree with u.  But 'kernel' is not.

> value of the network is to make it easy to connect and communicate
> between peers -- what happens after that is so radical it can hardly
> be speculated because it gets into the realm of emergent complexity.
> Again, I refer you to Reed's law on the value of such networks.
>
> marcos
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html