netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] of/phylib: Use device tree properties to initialize Marvell PHYs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:48:38 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC:	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>,
	Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of/phylib: Use device tree properties to initialize
 Marvell PHYs.

On 11/18/2010 12:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:54:30PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>> Some aspects of PHY initialization are board dependent, things like
>> indicator LED connections and some clocking modes cannot be determined
>> by probing.  The dev_flags element of struct phy_device can be used to
>> control these things if an appropriate value can be passed from the
>> Ethernet driver.  We run into problems however if the PHY connections
>> are specified by the device tree.  There is no way for the Ethernet
>> driver to know what flags it should pass.
>>
>> If we are using the device tree, the struct phy_device will be
>> populated with the device tree node corresponding to the PHY, and we
>> can extract extra configuration information from there.
>>
>> The next question is what should the format of that information be?
>> It is highly device specific, and the device tree representation
>> should not be tied to any arbitrary kernel defined constants.  A
>> straight forward representation is just to specify the exact bits that
>> should be set using the "marvell,reg-init" property:
>>
>>        phy5: ethernet-phy@5 {
>> 	reg =<5>;
>> 	device_type = "ethernet-phy";
>
> Some notes:
> - device_type is only relevant for real openfirmware platforms.  It
>    should not appear in dts files.

Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/phy.txt says device_type should be 
here.  I can remove it from my patch comment, but should it also be 
removed from the phy.txt file?

> - This example phy node needs a compatible property

Ok, what would you suggest?  Something like:

      compatible = "marvell,88e1145";

I can certainly do that, but I would note that the kernel probes these 
things and would completely ignore the compatible property.

> - This new binding needs to be documented.  You can use devicetree.org.
>

Agreed, I was planning to do that once the patch was approved.

Where would that go?  Vendor:Marvell, or Type:PHY/compatible=marvell,* 
... or somewhere else?

>> 	marvell,reg-init =
>> 		<0x00030010 0x5777>, /* Reg 3,16<- 0x5777 */
>> 		<0x00030011 0x00aa>, /* Reg 3,17<- 0x00aa */
>> 		<0x00030012 0x4105>, /* Reg 3,18<- 0x4105 */
>> 		<0x00030013 0x0060>; /* Reg 3,19<- 0x0060 */
>> 		<0x00020015 0x00300000>; /* clear bits 4..5 of Reg 2,21 */
>>        };
>>


Thanks,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html