[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291140855.2904.148.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:14:15 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bonding, GRO and tcp_reordering
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 09:56 -0800, Rick Jones a écrit :
> Short of packet traces, taking snapshots of netstat statistics before and after
> each netperf run might be goodness - you can look at things like ratio of ACKs
> to data segments/bytes and such. LRO/GRO can have a non-trivial effect on the
> number of ACKs, and ACKs are what matter for fast retransmit.
>
> netstat -s > before
> netperf ...
> netstat -s > after
> beforeafter before after > delta
>
> where beforeafter comes (for now, the site will have to go away before long as
> the campus on which it is located has been sold)
> ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/tools/ and will subtract before from after.
>
> happy benchmarking,
Yes indeed. With fast enough medium (or small MTUS), we can enter in a
backlog processing problem {filling huge receive queues}, as seen on
loopback lately...
netstat -s can show some receive queue overrun in this case.
TCPBacklogDrop: xxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists