[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012012004.34356.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:04:33 +0100
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@....de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6] net: Add batman-adv meshing protocol
David Miller wrote:
> From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@....de>
> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 19:54:19 +0100
>
> > Do you have any more possible duplication you have in your mind right
> > now?
>
> The hashing code, for the third time.
And I asked in the past about the removal of the hashing stuff without any
reaction. So, we removed most of it. resize and iterate will be dropped too.
So, is it a problem to have a hash_find, hash_remove, hash_add? These were
created to reduce duplicated code and not to create a complete new dynamic
datastructure (which it isn't... it is just the usual hlist stuff)
thanks,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists