netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] add netdev led trigger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101201000300.GJ21496@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:03:00 -0500
From:	Eric Cooper <ecc@....edu>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add netdev led trigger

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:15:51AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Using the device name as an identifier is not reliable, they may not
> be unique.

I'm confused about this -- how else can the user specify the desired network
interface?

> rwlocks are deprecated.

In favor of what?  Should I use a spinlock?

Thanks for the feedback.

-- 
Eric Cooper             e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html