netdev - Re: (Lack of) specification for RX n-tuple filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1291835681.2560.53.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:14:41 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Vladislav Zolotarov <vladz@...adcom.com>
Cc:	Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>,
	Peter Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: (Lack of) specification for RX n-tuple filtering

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0200, Vladislav Zolotarov wrote:
> > The implementation of the -U
> > option could potentially be made to fallback to ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLINS if
> > vlan_tag and user_def are not specified.
> > 
> 
> Having said that, don't u think that it could be more user friendly to
> extend the ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLINS interface to handle the lan_tag and
> user_def and drop the n-tuple interface at all?

No, we can't remove userland interfaces.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html