[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101209192548.GA1863@del.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:25:48 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tc: show format ABI changed
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:51:36PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Although well intentioned, the following patch should have not
> been applied since it changes the kernel ABI. It broke some scripts
> parsing the output format of tc commands.
I doubt you can blame this patch for changing any ABI. If there is
such a thing documented you would probably point us there. Otherwise,
it should be seen in the code, and tc has it all conditional:
if (tbs[TCA_STATS_RATE_EST]) {
...
fprintf(fp, "\n%srate %s %upps ",
prefix, sprint_rate(re.bps, b1), re.pps);
}
if (tbs[TCA_STATS_QUEUE]) {
...
if (!tbs[TCA_STATS_RATE_EST])
fprintf(fp, "\n%s", prefix);
fprintf(fp, "backlog %s %up requeues %u ",
sprint_size(q.backlog, b1), q.qlen, q.requeues);
}
which suggests scripts should use similar logic.
Anyway, these are tc's printouts and it should handle source data
errors too. Since it's accepted it can't be wrong ;-)
Jarek P.
>
> Before HTB would report bogus zero values, now it reports
> nothing and that changes the output format. Like the empty
> fields in /proc, I argue we can't play fast and loose with
> netlink responses.
>
> Not a big deal to fix the script in this case, in this case
> so don't revert it.
>
> commit d250a5f90e53f5e150618186230795352d154c88
> Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri Oct 2 10:32:18 2009 +0000
>
> pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate estimators
>
> Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Hmm... So you made me to do some "real" work here, and guess what?:
> > there is one serious checkpatch warning! ;-) Plus, this new parameter
> > should be added to the function description. Otherwise:
> > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jarek P.
> >
> > PS: I guess full "Don't" would show we really mean it...
>
> Okay :) Here is the last round, before the night !
>
> Thanks again
>
> [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Don't report fake rate estimators
>
> We currently send TCA_STATS_RATE_EST elements to netlink users, even if no estimator
> is running.
>
> # tc -s -d qdisc
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 112833764978 bytes 1495081739 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> User has no way to tell if the "rate 0bit 0pps" is a real estimation, or a fake
> one (because no estimator is active)
>
> After this patch, tc command output is :
> $ tc -s -d qdisc
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 561075 bytes 1196 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> We add a parameter to gnet_stats_copy_rate_est() function so that
> it can use gen_estimator_active(bstats, r), as suggested by Jarek.
>
> This parameter can be NULL if check is not necessary, (htb for
> example has a mandatory rate estimator)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists