[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101210130730.29d07c2d@jbarnes-desktop>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:07:30 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...r.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
Steve Hodgson <shodgson@...arflare.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>,
Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Brian King <brking@...ibm.com>,
Anil Ravindranath <anil_ravindranath@...-sierra.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.alsa@...il.com>,
boyod.yang@...iconmotion.com.cn
Subject: Re: PCI: make pci_restore_state return void
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:43:26 -0600
Jon Mason <jon.mason@...r.com> wrote:
> pci_restore_state only ever returns 0, thus there is no benefit in
> having it return any value. Also, a large majority of the callers do
> not check the return code of pci_restore_state. Make the
> pci_restore_state a void return and avoid the overhead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...r.com>
> ---
Applied to linux-next, thanks.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists