netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101209.201926.104055585.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:19:26 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc:	kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] New jhash function

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:53:45 +1030

> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:39:54 am David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
>> Date: Fri,  3 Dec 2010 13:38:59 +0100
>> 
>> > The current jhash.h implements the lookup2() hash function by Bob Jenkins. 
>> > However, lookup2() is outdated as Bob wrote a new hash function called 
>> > lookup3(). There is a longer comparison of those two and other hash
>> > functions at http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/doobs.html.
>> > 
>> > Please consider applying the following patches.
>> 
>> Patch #1 is already in the net-next-2.6 tree, and as long as there are
>> no major objections to the general crowd (including Rusty et al.) I am
>> happy to put patch #2 into my tree as well.
>> 
>> Rusty, does the current version of patch #2 look good to you?
> 
> Yes, 2/2 good.  Thanks Jozsef!
> 
> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>

Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html