[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012131952.39648.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:52:39 +0200
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Lucian Adrian Grijincu" <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>,
Vlad Dogaru <ddvlad@...edu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: add dev_close_many
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Monday 13 December 2010, 19:32:21
> With a message based interface, there shouldn't be a need for this.
> Just have one thread sending requests in user space, and one receiving
> the ACK's.
Sorry, you lost me here :) There is no need for the kernel thread / workqueue
or not even for dev_close_many?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists