[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292432120.3427.366.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:55:20 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling
Le mercredi 15 décembre 2010 à 17:43 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> Now we could remove the allot increase in sfq_dequeue for
> the case that the flow becomes inactive. It is incorrect
> anyways.
Hmm, we increase the allot for the next slot, not for the slot now
empty.
/* Is the slot empty? */
if (q->qs[a].qlen == 0) {
q->ht[q->hash[a]] = SFQ_DEPTH;
a = q->next[a]; // a = next slot index
if (a == old_a) {
q->tail = SFQ_DEPTH;
return skb;
}
q->next[q->tail] = a;
q->allot[a] += q->quantum;
// HERE, q->allot[a] is for next slot, we give it its quantum for being
activated
} else if ((q->allot[a] -= qdisc_pkt_len(skb)) <= 0) {
Maybe we should rename (a / old_a) by (a / next_a) to avoid confusion :)
I was thinking in allowing more packets per SFQ (but keep the 126 active
flows limit), what do you think ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists